<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mental notes to myself &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livebookmark.net/journal/category/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal</link>
	<description>web, money and etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Immunity on Duplicate Content</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/06/05/immunity-on-duplicate-content/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/06/05/immunity-on-duplicate-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/06/05/immunity-on-duplicate-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m trying to understand how google handles the duplicate contents and wondering why some sites are luckier than others, almost having an immunity for duplicate content issues.
Some collective sites like answers.com is seems to be immune to the duplicate content penalties.
See this page about smokey bear(PR4). Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but all I&#8217;m seeing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to understand how google handles the duplicate contents and wondering why some sites are luckier than others, almost having an immunity for duplicate content issues.<br />
Some collective sites like <a href="http://answers.com" rel="nofollow">answers.com</a> is seems to be immune to the duplicate content penalties.<br />
See this page about <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/smokey-bear" rel="nofollow">smokey bear</a>(PR4). Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but all I&#8217;m seeing is a rip of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smokey_Bear">wikipedia page</a>(PR6) along with lots and lots of advertisements.<br />
Who can really say that this page benefits surfers when wikipedia page is exactly the same thing. I guess answers.com is taking this duplication tactics to the roof. Google is also helping them to drive traffic by hardlinking to their content as the &#8220;definition&#8221; reference.<br />
I&#8217;m expecting no comments from Matt Cutts <img src='http://livebookmark.net/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> , just thinking laudly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/06/05/immunity-on-duplicate-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missing categories in Google&#8217;s Directory</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/06/04/missing-categories-in-googles-directory/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/06/04/missing-categories-in-googles-directory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DMOZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/06/04/missing-categories-in-googles-directory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was checking for the  Free Content category on DMOZ.org and I saw it&#8217;s updated. I also tried the check the google version. Big surprise! The category does not exist in google&#8217;s dmoz copy.
I&#8217;m not sure if this is on purpose, but it&#8217;s most likely that google is also moderating the biggest moderated directory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was checking for the  Free Content category on DMOZ.org and I saw it&#8217;s updated. I also tried the check the google version. Big surprise! The category does not exist in google&#8217;s dmoz copy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if this is on purpose, but it&#8217;s most likely that google is also moderating the biggest moderated directory on the net. Hehe that&#8217;s a good one.</p>
<p>See it yourself (I&#8217;m not sure for how long this links will be alive)<br />
<a href="http://dmoz.org/Business/Publishing_and_Printing/Publishing/Services/Free_Content/ ">Dmoz link </a>: updated around June 4th<br />
<a href="http://directory.google.com/Top/Business/Publishing_and_Printing/Publishing/Services/Free_Content/">Google&#8217;s Link</a>:  doesn&#8217;t exist as of June 5th</p>
<p>Also I&#8217;ve found if you search for url that exist on dmoz&#8217;s certain category, google returns a result but the link is simply for oh for.<br />
See the <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ynwd3a">first link</a>.</p>
<p>Last notes: Yahoo&#8217;s directory doesn&#8217;t have the category too. I kind of understand it since the category is under Business branch and it&#8217;s a paid service for yahoo to appear under that branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/06/04/missing-categories-in-googles-directory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sitemaps in the robots.txt Happy Harvesting</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/04/11/sitemaps-in-the-robotstxt-happy-harvesting/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/04/11/sitemaps-in-the-robotstxt-happy-harvesting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitemaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/04/11/sitemaps-in-the-robotstxt-happy-harvesting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just read the Google Webmaster&#8217;s blog about the news on ask.com supporting Sitemaps.org&#8217;s sitemap format.
This is really a great news for all the people that like to be crawled faster and acurately.
For me the more interesting part about this news is that sitemaps.org&#8217;s proposal to include sitemaps into the robots.txt.
Simply you add a line [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just read the Google Webmaster&#8217;s blog about the news on ask.com supporting Sitemaps.org&#8217;s sitemap format.<br />
This is really a great news for all the people that like to be crawled faster and acurately.<br />
For me the more interesting part about this news is that sitemaps.org&#8217;s proposal to include sitemaps into the robots.txt.</p>
<p>Simply you add a line into your robots.txt saying</p>
<blockquote><p>
Sitemap: &lt;sitemap_location&gt;&lt;/sitemap_location&gt;
</p></blockquote>
<p>This part is really cool but for site harvesters it&#8217;s an unbelivable tool. So you can handover the key to your site and web harvesters can crawl your site really easily because probably you&#8217;ve put all your site&#8217;s pages into your sitemap.</p>
<p>Sounds like a good plan in an ideal world. With all the cloakers and content scrapers you must be really smart not to be ripped apart.</p>
<p>My suggestion is to know who you&#8217;re serving the sitemap. Currently Google, Yahoo and Ask is supporting this sitemaps.xml and no other site has anything to do with it.<br />
Here is a simple check you can add in the begining of your sitemap thing:</p>
<p><code>
<pre>
< ?php
    function botIsAllowed($ip){
        //get the reverse dns of the ip.
        $host = strtolower(gethostbyaddr($ip));
        $botDomains = array('.inktomisearch.com',
                                     '.googlebot.com',
                                     '.ask.com',
                             );

        //search for the reverse dns matches the white list
        foreach($botDomains as $bot){
            if (strpos(strrev($host),strrev($bot))===0){
                $qip= gethostbyname($host);
                return ($qip==$ip);
            }
        }
        return false;
}

if (!botIsAllowed($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'])){
    echo "Banned!";
    exit;
}
?>
</pre>
<p></code></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure everyone can get the idea of reverse dns and forward dns checking.<br />
If I missed any decent site that uses the sitemaps let me know.</p>
<p>Note: If you&#8217;re still using static sitemaps (!) you can just include the xml after the code. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/04/11/sitemaps-in-the-robotstxt-happy-harvesting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Base Banned Keywords</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/03/11/google-base-banned-keywords/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/03/11/google-base-banned-keywords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/03/11/google-base-banned-keywords/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started submitting some items to google base using the API.
It was all going fine until I realized some keywords were banned from the description, title or URL.
I was posting the free articles I have, about various subjects and my purpose was not spamming.
It&#8217;s kind of weird if you want to post a news about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started submitting some items to google base using the API.<br />
It was all going fine until I realized some keywords were banned from the description, title or URL.<br />
I was posting the free articles I have, about various subjects and my purpose was not spamming.<br />
It&#8217;s kind of weird if you want to post a news about anti-online gambling and to get banned.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a stupid keyword match, not a context match. This means you can&#8217;t really post anything about those keywords even if you&#8217;re writing against or for.</p>
<p>Here is the list I&#8217;ve found that is banned. Maybe there are more.</p>
<p>Update: I&#8217;ve found this one which is really weird: iraqi dinar</p>
<p><span id="more-142"></span><br />
iraqi dinar<br />
anabolic steroid<br />
buy diethylpropion<br />
buy ephedra<br />
buy generic viagra<br />
buy levitra<br />
buy pain relief<br />
buy phentermine<br />
buy prescription<br />
buy re<br />
buy viagra<br />
cable descrambler<br />
casino online<br />
casino roulette<br />
child pornography<br />
designer replica<br />
fake degrees<br />
fake diploma<br />
find pharmacies<br />
get medications<br />
get viagara<br />
internet casino<br />
internet gambling<br />
online blackjack<br />
online casino<br />
online craps<br />
online kasino<br />
online kasinos<br />
online poker<br />
online roulette<br />
online slots<br />
play online casino<br />
play online poker<br />
play roulette online<br />
play texas holdem<br />
pokeronline<br />
replica designer handbags<br />
replica handbags<br />
replica watch<br />
sportbetting<br />
sportsbook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/03/11/google-base-banned-keywords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Ad Presentation from Adsense</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/12/21/new-ad-presentation-from-adsense/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/12/21/new-ad-presentation-from-adsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/12/21/new-ad-presentation-from-adsense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I realized a new presentation of &#8220;Ads by Google&#8221; thing on the adsense advertisments
Looks really nice
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realized a new presentation of &#8220;Ads by Google&#8221; thing on the adsense advertisments<br />
Looks really nice<img src="http://livebookmark.net/journal/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/adsense.png" alt="adsense new" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/12/21/new-ad-presentation-from-adsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wins By Losing</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/11/01/google-wins-by-losing/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/11/01/google-wins-by-losing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/11/01/google-wins-by-losing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article on googles non-search products and how they&#8217;re expanding their business.
Some of Google&#8217;s non-search projects are really extensions of its search monetization, and are likely to succeed. But others projects mean entering areas where Google doesn&#8217;t have much experience, and is taking a risk. With regard to those riskier areas, the key question for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article on googles non-search products and how they&#8217;re expanding their business.</p>
<blockquote><p>Some of Google&#8217;s non-search projects are really extensions of its search monetization, and are likely to succeed. But others projects mean entering areas where Google doesn&#8217;t have much experience, and is taking a risk. With regard to those riskier areas, the key question for Google&#8217;s future is whether it can realize that losing is really one of the best assets the company has.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more on:<br />
<a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&#038;art_aid=50359">mediapost</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/11/01/google-wins-by-losing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eBay bans Google checkout</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/07/07/ebay-bans-google-checkout/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/07/07/ebay-bans-google-checkout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/07/07/ebay-bans-google-checkout/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a surprising news that eBay is banning Google checkout.
Are they too scared to compete with Google.
Checkout the accepted payments list on eBay.

Payment Services permitted on eBay: Allpay.net, Bidpay, Canadian Tire Money, cash2india, CertaPay, Checkfree.com, hyperwallet,com, Moneybookers.com, Ozpay.biz, Paymate.com.au, Propay.com, XOOM
Payment Services not permitted on eBay: AlertPay.com, anypay.com, AuctionChex.com, AuctionPix.com, BillPay.ie, ecount.com, cardserviceinternational.com, CCAvenue, ecount, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a surprising news that <a href="http://www.dpbolvw.net/k6115mu2-u1HJOKNLLNHKKIKOLR?SID=lb">eBay</a> is banning Google checkout.<br />
Are they too scared to compete with Google.<br />
Checkout the <a href="http://www.anrdoezrs.net/click-1625335-5463217?loc=http%3A//pages.ebay.com/help/policies/accepted-payments-policy.html">accepted payments list</a> on eBay.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>Payment Services permitted on eBay:</strong> Allpay.net, Bidpay, Canadian Tire Money, cash2india, CertaPay, Checkfree.com, hyperwallet,com, Moneybookers.com, Ozpay.biz, Paymate.com.au, Propay.com, XOOM</p>
<p><strong>Payment Services not permitted on eBay:</strong> AlertPay.com, anypay.com, AuctionChex.com, AuctionPix.com, BillPay.ie, ecount.com, cardserviceinternational.com, CCAvenue, ecount, e-gold, eHotPay.com, ePassporte.com, EuroGiro, FastCash.com, Google Checkout, gcash, GearPay, Goldmoney.com, graphcard.com, greenzap.com, ikobo.com, Liberty Dollars, Moneygram.com, neteller.com, Netpay.com, Nochex.com, paychest.com, payingfast.com, Payko.com, paypay, Postepay, Qchex.com, rupay.com, scripophily.com, sendmoneyorder.com, stamps, Stormpay, wmtransfer.com, xcoin.com </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/07/07/ebay-bans-google-checkout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE7 did it again</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/02/08/ie7-did-it-again/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/02/08/ie7-did-it-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/02/08/ie7-did-it-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a big surprise for me to see Google Adsense is not working on IE7.
It&#8217;s because IE7 is blocking third party javascripts. It&#8217;s really a matter of Microsoft to decide to block Google.
Maybe Google Adsense will re-write the Adsense code to show it as a local javascript not to loose their 2 billion share in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a big surprise for me to see Google Adsense is not working on IE7.<br />
It&#8217;s because IE7 is blocking third party javascripts. It&#8217;s really a matter of Microsoft to decide to block Google.<br />
Maybe Google Adsense will re-write the Adsense code to show it as a local javascript not to loose their 2 billion share in the pay per click scene.<br />
And this will affect other ad programs like chitika, clicksor or else.<br />
Say goodbye to your javascript ads if this feature on IE7 becomes official.<br />
However it&#8217;s only in Micro$oft&#8217;s hand to do an exception for certain javascripts to run cross domain, but I don&#8217;t guess they will do that favour to Google any soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/02/08/ie7-did-it-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google AdSense Account Disabled  ?!?!!!</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/01/21/google-adsense-account-disabled/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/01/21/google-adsense-account-disabled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/01/21/google-adsense-account-disabled/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a regular day that I checked my google adsense account and I saw that message:
No AdSense Account
An AdSense account does not exist for this login, as you have not yet completed an application. If you are using your AdWords login, you can create an AdSense account with the same login.
I was really confused, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a regular day that I checked my google adsense account and I saw that message:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>No AdSense Account<br />
</strong>An AdSense account does not exist for this login, as you have not yet completed an application. If you are using your AdWords login, you can create an AdSense account with the same login.</p></blockquote>
<p>I was really confused, I checked my emails an the bad news: Google AdSense Account Disabled.<br />
<span id="more-116"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Due Invalid clicks, your google adsense account disabled&#8221;, is the email you receive and you don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;ve done wrong. Also the email reminds you that :</p>
<blockquote><p>Publishers disabled for invalid click activity are not allowed further participation in AdSense and do not receive any further payment. The earnings on your account will be properly returned to the affected advertisers.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can appeal to the account closure but it&#8217;s uncertain that they&#8217;ll enable you again. Google is really taking the invalid click issue seriously. I started searching the internet about other people getting disabled, to see if anyone has been able to get their accounts back.</p>
<p>But IÂ was getting desperateÂ after reading that people are kissing their accounts good bye after closures due to invalid clicks.</p>
<p>I replied to the email immediately asking why I am kicked out. There were no replys for the first day. So started changing all the adversitements on my site to other pay-per-click ads. Oh God no other PPC program pays as good as Google does. Why? Should I start worshiping Yahoo?.</p>
<p>I checked Yahoo&#8217;s PPC program but devastated by the notice: You must have a valid US SSN. Hey I&#8217;m a canadian can&#8217;t I participate Yahoo Ads?</p>
<p>I even changed my default search to Yahoo because I was so pissed off to Google.</p>
<p>The other day I received a brief email from Google Adsense saying &#8220;yeah you can appeal to this by sending an email to blah blah blah but it&#8217;s in our rights to accept you back or not.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good enough! I replyed the second email and waiting for an answers, 2 day passed.</p>
<p>By the time I realized that google was a really important part of my internet life. Switching to yahoo for search engine really sucked! It was really slow to do the searches, somethingÂ that I haven&#8217;t realized before. I even stoped using Gmail, Google Groups etc. And I realized life without google is a real pain.</p>
<p>After the second day of appeal, I received another email from Google.Â  Hey they are taking me back!!! effective immediately and I&#8217;ll be saving my un-paid balance as well. Yes this is a good ending story. Maybe I&#8217;m the only one blogging about being taken back.(at least that I know)</p>
<p>I waited another 24 hour until the ad-display turns to normal.</p>
<p>In conclusion, in 3 days I realized how Google is important to me and to my website. I understand Google for the account closure, because there are 1000s of cheaters that they have to be careful about. But Google showed it&#8217;s spirit as concerning about my appeal.Â Google is really giant as a corporation but they are really keeping the amateur in spirit as they grow , concerning about each individual&#8217;s situations and etc.. That&#8217;s the difference between Micro$oft and Google I see. And I don&#8217;t think that Google will be a real big brother like everybody is affraid of.</p>
<p>Even if they become &#8220;the biggest&#8221; it&#8217;s no harm to the people like me. We should try to take benefit from that. But it&#8217;s a harm it&#8217;s competition and that&#8217;s too bad for them.</p>
<p>Anyway, loosing only 3 days of income, I&#8217;m back showing up the Adsense Ads. I strongly suggest you not to put all the eggs in the same basket, just in case. If you&#8217;re not a cheater and got a closure, don&#8217;t feel bad, explain your situation to google. Try to explain that your traffic is legit and you&#8217;re sensitive about the invalid clicks too.</p>
<p>They are in the end got bigger because of the people like you and me. They still care. At least by now.</p>
<p>Â Did you like this story? <a href="http://digg.com/technology/Google_AdSense_Account_Disabled_">Digg it here</a></p>
<p>Thoughts Aside:<br />
The <a href="http://www.rankingtown.com">search engine submission</a> is the most basic method to drive good traffic for your website. Plus <a href="http://www.rankingtown.com/Marketing-Info/Email-Marketing.html">email marketing</a> enables your visitors to visit your every so often. Several <a href="http://www.rankingtown.com/Marketing-Info/">network marketing</a> tools are available on the internet that provides <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/acoas/nominations/jaye.htm">internet marketing solutions</a>. And they can also inform you in case if Google disables your <a href="http://www.cac.ca.gov/153/20070912.html">adwords advertising</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2006/01/21/google-adsense-account-disabled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google is backing up Firefox</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2005/11/29/google-is-backing-up-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2005/11/29/google-is-backing-up-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harun Yayli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the guys at Google backing up Firefox very well.
I&#8217;ve just seen the new option in Google Adsense for new Firefox banners.
So go ahead and download then install&#8230;
Paysback $1.00 to the publisher.  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the guys at Google backing up Firefox very well.<br />
I&#8217;ve just seen the new option in Google Adsense for new Firefox banners.</p>
<p>So go ahead and download then install&#8230;<br />
Paysback $1.00 to the publisher. <img src='http://livebookmark.net/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2005/11/29/google-is-backing-up-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
