<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full text index and other complex indexes together</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/04/30/full-text-index-and-other-complex-indexes-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/04/30/full-text-index-and-other-complex-indexes-together/</link>
	<description>web, money and etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Aksyonoff</title>
		<link>http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/04/30/full-text-index-and-other-complex-indexes-together/#comment-5867</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Aksyonoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livebookmark.net/journal/2007/04/30/full-text-index-and-other-complex-indexes-together/#comment-5867</guid>
		<description>

Try moving your fulltext indexes to Sphinx, http://sphinxsearch.com/

That way you could still have fulltext searches on that table without hurting other queries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try moving your fulltext indexes to Sphinx, <a href="http://sphinxsearch.com/" rel="nofollow">http://sphinxsearch.com/</a></p>
<p>That way you could still have fulltext searches on that table without hurting other queries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
